Archive for the ‘PR’ Category

Tackle like a queen

Tuesday, March 15th, 2011

So Hugh Grant’s offended some people again. Apparently, Grant was watching the England versus Scotland Six Nations game at Twickenham Stadium when he was invited into the commentary box to share his expertise. During the subsequent interview Grant remarked: “I discovered it hurt less if you tackled hard than if you tackled like a queen.” Viewers reacted badly to the humour however, (although I’m not sure how many) with one labelling it old-school homophobia. A BBC spokesman then went on record to apologise for any offence caused.

Now the comment doesn’t particularly offend me, although I can see how it might offend some. But this stupid idea of public apologies does. Seems like if you’re a celeb, and you do something that makes the news ‘cos it’s offended a few people, you are then forced to ‘officially apologise’. And that makes everything all right again. And that’s obviously ridiculous. It also seems to say “It’s ok to do what you want so long as you officially apologise to everyone in the world” (as oppose to the few you might actually have hurt or offended.) Whether it’s an offensive comment, or shagging around. Which is not really a great message is it? Wouldn’t it be better to encourage people to think before they act, to not do these things in the first place? It seems to me that the ‘public apology’ does exactly the opposite.

On the flip side, once they’ve done their offensive doings, I think it would be nice if one day a celeb stuck to their guns and went “Actually, I meant what I said and if you’re offended you can piss right off*” Anything but these transparent piecemeal nonsense apologies.

*If you’re offended by the swearing I would like to take this opportunity to officially apologise.

Social media – it’s not all that.

Wednesday, February 2nd, 2011

“Everyone needs to be involved in social media. A Twitter account is a must.” Really?

There’s a lot of buzz about social media at the moment. It’s new(ish) to a lot of people, and there really aren’t many people out there who know all that much about it. (Although there are a lot of people who’ll tell you they know it all. And charge you a lot of money to tell you.) Why do I think this? Well, for one thing, as I’ve already said, it’s pretty new. Compared to traditional media anyway. And the trouble with newish technology is that it tends to go through an ‘Everyone has to have it because it’s the best thing ever’ phase. Until the next best thing ever. And that, I think, is the phase we’re currently in. There are hundreds of sites telling you about how important it all is, how to “Streamline your Twitter strategy” or whatever. And in my opinion, most of it’s bollocks. Why? Because nobody really knows yet. We don’t know how to use it best, we don’t know why we should use it, or even if (gasp) every business actually needs a social media strategy.

I would suggest that most people who are using Twitter for business are getting very little, if not nothing at all out if it. It’s a waste of their time. But they do it because they think they should. Because everyone else is. Same with Facebook, Linkedin et al. And it’s not because they haven’t “Streamlined their strategy.” IT’S BECAUSE SOCIAL MEDIA IS WRONG FOR THEM.

Just as television advertising is wrong for some companies, and direct mail might not be the right approach, so it is with social media. It’s not the be all and end all, it doesn’t magically increase sales and revenue, IT’S JUST A TOOL. Just one tool in a very large box. And you don’t use a spanner to bang in a nail.

Having said all that, used in a creative and innovative way, this particular tool can be a very very effective one. I’ve recently seen two excellent examples of using Twitter  to generate either sales or traffic.

The first was by an illustrator called Johanna Basford who creates beautiful, intricate illustrations. She came up with a project called TwitterPicture. In her words: To get involved, all you had to do was tweet Johanna what you would like to see included in her drawing and she would draw each and every twitter suggestion (except anything deemed too rude for innocent eyes!). So be it a pirate ship, a yeti footprint, a medieval castle or a Venus fly trap, all the twitter suggestions were translated into pen and ink to create an eclectic snap shot of Twitter imaginations over a 2 day period.

She broadcast this process live with updated photos on her blog, and it generated a massive amount of interest and publicity. She then sold 100 limited edition prints of the finished drawing through her website. It was an excellent use of Twitter, it made fantastic use of the connective and inclusive nature of the thing and it resulted in real sales, huge positive PR and a lot of fun too. As well as a lovely image (which looks great on the wall in my lounge.)

The second example is from Graphic Design Forums. It’s simple, but effective. They’re running a competition for the forum members to win, among other things, the brand new Adobe CS5 suite. How do you enter? Just tweet the competition or mention it in your blog. So the site gets increased traffic, and I assume increased ad revenue, and the members get the chance to win a excellent prize.
I’m sure there are loads of other examples of social media done well, but there are hundreds more of it being done badly, or worse still, done blindly. I’m not saying it’s not got its uses. Just that it’s not quite as important as many people would have you believe.

Farmer’s own seed

Monday, January 25th, 2010

As I drive around the countryside, I sometimes come across this sign. ‘Farmer’s Own seed.’ It never fails to make me smile. (Maybe I’ve just got a very immature sense of humour.) The point is this: Every farmer who sells seeds seems to use the same wording. Wording which is obviously open to amusing misinterpretation by childish people like me. So why do they all use it? Why not put ‘Seeds direct from the farm,’ for example? Are they even aware of the connotations?

To be fair, that’s quite a flippant example. There are others:

Firstly, the infamous recent Ilfracombe rebranding.

ilfracombe-logo-design

Now, it’s not a horrible looking logo (although you can really tell the client wanted to ‘Do an Innocent.’
The designer, Tessa Martin, said: “The new Ilfracombe logo, with its idiosyncratic ‘swirl’ above the ‘i’ indicates intrigue, mystery and drama expressed with a spot of humour and fun too .It also reflects the twists and turns of the landscape and can conjure up thoughts of the seaside, sea, an ice cream, the harbour and fish.”

No Tessa, IT LOOKS LIKE A SPERM. No amount of post rationalisation design marketing speak will stop people seeing that. So, how can this happen? How can a logo go through all the meetings, consultations and amendments this one has undoubtedly gone through without someone going “Ummm, but doesn’t it look like one of my little soldiers?” And this to brand a town with the second highest teenage pregnancy rate in Devon.

1. Well, maybe the designer was having a laugh and seeing how far it would go. It does happen, trust me.

2. Or maybe people really didn’t see it until it was too late.

3. Maybe the designer didn’t see it and bamboozled the client with words like ‘Ideosyncratic swirl’ in order to sell it to them.

4. Or, and this I think is closer to what actually happens in these cases, people saw it but chose not to say anything. Creatives can be intimidating people, standing up persuasively, and often rightly, for their work. And feedback meetings can be intimidating places, nobody wanting to say the wrong thing in case they sound stupid. So perhaps someone did see the sperm, but nobody liked to say. It’s called groupthink, and it happens all the time in meetings. You could also call it ‘Emperor’s new clothes syndrome.’

Here’s another one:

YAKULT_Couch

Now, I’m not sure why he’s got all those tissues, but it doesn’t look like he’s gonna blow his nose…

Gordon likes Lasan

Friday, November 13th, 2009

Lasan, whose chef, Aktar Islam, featured on this very site last month, has won yet another award – this time on TV’s ‘The F Word’. They went head to head with the Curry Corner from Cheltenham to see who would come out on top as Britain’s best local curry restaurant. (Wonder if by ‘local’ they mean ‘outside London?’) Needless to say, they won. So, just to add to the congratulations. Nice one Aktar!

Taste_09_ 351final lores Taste_09_ 356lores

Miss Birmingham works out

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

Just finished a shoot for Townhouse Communications to show the lengths some ladies (and some men I know too…) will go to in order to look good for the Christmas party. Miss Birmingham, in a gym, in a mini dress, putting on lip gloss. Not a bad way to earn a living.

[qt:/blog/movies/workout.m4v 480 360]